Models don’t understand the full picture until you prompt them. Their input capabilities are limited, making them great for small examples and demonstrations but inadequate for real production systems with many complexities—at least the models available to most users today. Debugging model-generated code can be challenging; the code often looks correct but may contain subtle flaws. Unfortunately, many developers incorporate such code without thorough checks, only to discover later that it works in limited cases and fails in others.
Models are also outdated. Technology evolves quickly, and frameworks move faster than models can adapt. For example, asking a model to generate a GitHub Action for building a Node.js app and deploying it to Azure AKS might result in outdated library versions. Experienced developers can navigate this by asking precise questions, but less experienced users may overlook critical considerations, such as whether AKS is the best fit or if a simpler solution would suffice.
Infrastructure decisions and tool selection require expertise. Tools are designed for specific use cases, and choosing the right one often demands experience. For example, selecting between GitOps and a simple pipeline is not a decision today’s models can make effectively.
Code ownership is another emerging challenge. Questions about intellectual property, such as ownership of generated images styled after famous artists, remain unresolved. Debates are ongoing, and new laws will likely take time to develop.
Security risks are a significant concern. As tools like Copilot become standard for developers, there’s potential for insecure model-generated code to become an attack vector. Hackers could exploit patterns in insecure code generation or manipulate third-party tools to insert backdoors. The growing reliance on these tools underscores the need for vigilance, expertise, and robust security practices.